Why Rosemont
A Q&A with Rosemont’s founder and principal discussing Special Situations providing more insight on what the firm does and what sets them apart.
Described here are templates of special situation and special projects in which we are most active.
Violations flagged inspection by authorities, or inability to to meet tightening regulations and standards can cause disruption, delays, penalties or worse: shutdowns.
Not always malicious, as the firm balances costs, competitiveness, and compliance. Its effects are non-linear and persistent. Optionality narrows with time. A purely legal response risks hardening positions. An operational adjustment may actually not be what the authorities need to see. Poor handling may lead to stricter oversight, undermining your regulatory standing towards investors, regulators or public exposure. This can be avoided.
Premature decisions must be resisted, despite pressure. By recognizing the full playfield and by addressing issues at the right level, the organization is left in a much stronger position, with new space to maneuver.
Case report: Emissions Allowance Breach
Divesting physical assets or closing down a facility. This involves a large number of stakeholders, all of whom need to be on board with the approach on your way out, while negotiating the terms of the sale and transferring risk.
A highly complex process surfacing every latent risk, with parties often having very contradictory interests that may change overnight, with completely misaligned timing. It is a non-standard event. No preexisting framework fits. The approach gets discovered by engaging the situation, in order to chart a course forward.
It is entirely situational and dependent on its inherent risks and conditions. Careful stakeholder orchestration and negotiation is required to reconcile differences, coordinate deep expertise and arrive at an elegant solution that hands of the asset with no remaining liability under any circumstance.
Case studies: Large Scale Facility Upgrade | Foreign Direct Investment in New Manufacturing Site
Significant capital committed: new production capacity, upgrades to fab or factory and technology acquisition, under pressure. A complex process with set timelines and all the pieces must fit.
Many foreseen, some emerging only as the work is underway. No playbook exists for this and no single silo alone can resolve the constraints and regulatory hurdles must be overcome, while maintaining stakeholder expectations.
The investment proceeds without losing time, capital, or value to inconsistencies between legal, operational, and stakeholder considerations. A workable path navigated and the organization moves forward minimizing delay or cost overruns.
Case study: Factory Closure and Site Sale
An organization experiencing disruption or breakdown that affects its ability to function properly. It may struggle to make equipment work. It may have become over-reliant on a single resource or vendor, or things that used to work simply aren’t working anymore.
Problems rarely come alone. What begins as a market shift or the loss of key personnel can quickly cascade, amplified by missing information or siloed decision-making. An incident may expose a deeper weakness. Often this is an early indicator of structural weakness: an organization ossifying, people working increasingly in siloes, oversight lacking, resulting in the inability to adequately respond to new demands. When the situation persists, knock-on effects accumulate. Acting swiftly avoids worse.
Such problems are diffuse by nature. They touch multiple functions and cannot be solved locally. A holistic approach is required, one that takes into account all the moving pieces, recognizes the emerging pattern, and informs a possible way forward. It is an open-ended problem, with no specific solution; only a recovery of process, system, or structure. Sometimes through temporary stand-in, sometimes through reorientation, so function gets restored.
Case study: Crisis Recovery
Teams tasked with making equipment work, get a pilot plant up and running, or attempting a breakthrough innovation, but finds itself going in circles, locked in under pressure, and struggling to make progress.
Non-standard by definition, highly complex, with constraints and expertise straddling all domains and with the not yet in existence.
The team has the technical depth and the resources. What is often needed is an someone enabling the team to properly integrate perspectives independent of discipline to get across.
Case studies: None disclosed
Teams tasked with making equipment work, get a pilot plant up and running, or attempting a breakthrough innovation, but finds itself going in circles, locked in under pressure, and struggling to make progress.
Non-standard by definition, highly complex, with constraints and expertise straddling all domains and with the solution not yet in existence.
The team has the technical depth and the resources. What is often needed is an someone enabling the team to properly integrate perspectives independent of discipline to get across.
Case studies: None disclosed
Discussed here are cases in which we played a pivotal role in the past.
Client: Undisclosed International Business Consortium
Business deal involving large scale investment in dairy sector required fast-tracking permit procedure and successfully overcoming regulatory constaints in close coordination with stakeholders.
Client: Undisclosed Production site of NYSE-listed company
Site closure and subsequent divestiture of production plant with preexisting conflict required dealmaking and risk transfer with (hostile) stakeholders.
Client: Undisclosed Large manufacturing facility, Nasdaq-listed
Recovery of business processes after a cascade of of downturns post-corona, resulting in a crisis with key clients at stake.
The organization experienced loss of key personnel and knowledge and a misrepresentation lawsuit pending, with several external audits due. The organization was rescued under high time pressure.
Client: Undisclosed Production site of NYSE-listed company
Faced with regulatory enforcement over a breach with limited time to find a solution and heavy penalties for persisting non-compliance. Their emissions exceeded the imposed allowance, with a huge investment in abatement technology as the only apparent fix. In conjuction with engineers a elegant work-around was found, that avoided both penalties and the forced investment.
Client: Undisclosed EU Multinational
A foreign European business operator planned expansion into the Netherlands with a new manufacturing facility and logistics hub.
The project was overcoming several constraints, one being a dealbreaker. Solutions and work-arounds were found and and approvals secured.
Client: Undisclosed NYSE-listed
Post-acquisition integration of 5 portfolio companies across the Netherlands involving structuring
A Q&A with Rosemont’s founder and principal discussing Special Situations providing more insight on what the firm does and what sets them apart.