A Pivotal Role
A consequential situation is rarely just a legal or financial problem. It does not neatly fit any single professional category.
It involves multiple domains at once, i.e. legal, operational, human interactions. Rosemont works at that intersection without the limitation of siloed approaches.
We translate the various inputs into a coherent picture, which informs the decision-making that charts a path succesfully navigating the situation.
Direct Observation
Reality is unaffected by appearances or preferred narratives. It rewards the ability to read the cues, pick up the signal, and understand the terrain that must be navigated. It speaks its own language. The skill is knowing how to translate it and get an orientation.
About Us
Business Life Cycle Situations
These situation templates in are examples of our work field. Each template shows relevant case material of some of our past engagements where made available.
01.
Facing tightening regulations, enforcement or deteriorated government relations.
Violations flagged inspection by authorities, or inability to to meet tightening regulations and standards can cause disruption, delays, penalties or worse: shutdowns.
Not always malicious, as the firm balances costs, competitiveness, and compliance. Its effects are non-linear and persistent. Optionality narrows with time. A purely legal response risks hardening positions. An operational adjustment may actually not be what the authorities need to see. Poor handling may lead to stricter oversight, undermining your regulatory standing towards investors, regulators or public exposure. This can be avoided.
Premature decisions must be resisted, despite pressure. By recognizing the full playfield and by addressing issues at the right level, the organization is left in a much stronger position, with new space to maneuver.
Case report: Emissions Allowance Breach
02.
Major investment: Asset Acquisition and New Production Capacity
Divesting physical assets or closing down a facility. This involves a large number of stakeholders, all of whom need to be on board with the approach on your way out, while negotiating the terms of the sale and transferring risk.
A highly complex process surfacing every latent risk, with parties often having very contradictory interests that may change overnight, with completely misaligned timing. It is a non-standard event. No preexisting framework fits. The approach gets discovered by engaging the situation, in order to chart a course forward.
It is entirely situational and dependent on its inherent risks and conditions. Careful stakeholder orchestration and negotiation is required to reconcile differences, coordinate deep expertise and arrive at an elegant solution that hands of the asset with no remaining liability under any circumstance.
03.
Complex Asset Transfer and Site Closure
Significant capital committed: new production capacity, upgrades to fab or factory and technology acquisition, under pressure. A complex process with set timelines and all the pieces must fit.
Many foreseen, some emerging only as the work is underway. No playbook exists for this and no single silo alone can resolve the constraints and regulatory hurdles must be overcome, while maintaining stakeholder expectations.
The investment proceeds without losing time, capital, or value to inconsistencies between legal, operational, and stakeholder considerations. A workable path navigated and the organization moves forward minimizing delay or cost overruns.
Case study: Factory Closure and Site Sale
04.
Organizational Disruption and Crisis Recovery
An organization experiencing disruption or breakdown that affects its ability to function properly. It may struggle to make equipment work. It may have become over-reliant on a single resource or vendor, or things that used to work simply aren’t working anymore.
Problems rarely come alone. What begins as a market shift or the loss of key personnel can quickly cascade, amplified by missing information or siloed decision-making. An incident may expose a deeper weakness. Often this is an early indicator of structural weakness: an organization ossifying, people working increasingly in siloes, oversight lacking, resulting in the inability to adequately respond to new demands. When the situation persists, knock-on effects accumulate. Acting swiftly avoids worse.
Such problems are diffuse by nature. They touch multiple functions and cannot be solved locally. A holistic approach is required, one that takes into account all the moving pieces, recognizes the emerging pattern, and informs a possible way forward. It is an open-ended problem, with no specific solution; only a recovery of process, system, or structure. Sometimes through temporary stand-in, sometimes through reorientation, so function gets restored.
Case study: Crisis Recovery in Large Plant
05.
External Threats and Hostilities
Teams tasked with making equipment work, get a pilot plant up and running, or attempting a breakthrough innovation, but finds itself going in circles, locked in under pressure, and struggling to make progress.
Non-standard by definition, highly complex, with constraints and expertise straddling all domains and with the not yet in existence.
The team has the technical depth and the resources. What is often needed is an someone enabling the team to properly integrate perspectives independent of discipline to get across.
Case studies: None disclosed
06.
Teams Unable to Make Progress
Teams tasked with making equipment work, get a pilot plant up and running, or attempting a breakthrough innovation, but finds itself going in circles, locked in under pressure, and struggling to make progress.
Non-standard by definition, highly complex, with constraints and expertise straddling all domains and with the solution not yet in existence.
The team has the technical depth and the resources. What is often needed is an someone enabling the team to properly integrate perspectives independent of discipline to get across.
Case studies: None disclosed
What We Do
“We don’t know where we are going, but we know exactly how to get there.” Learn why.
Behind the Firm
Lennart Huisjes
Special Situations Director
From the Founder
Well over a decade ago I took on a role that exposed me to nearly every aspect of a large multinational, its operations, its challenges and its dealings. That experience put me in the position to advise them on a wide range of challenges that they weren’t familiar with themselves. This turned into what I now refer to as special situations, the form of what Rosemont is today. This work involves everything that excites me, the stakes, the challenge, and the human dynamics that underpin every business interaction.
Insight
Insights, Updates, and Cloud Innovation
Latest Articles
Insights
Why Rosemont
A Q&A with Rosemont’s founder and principal discussing Special Situations providing more insight on what the firm does and what sets them apart.